Just started... How to Live: Or A Life of Montaigne in One Question and Twenty Attempts at an Answer, by Sarah Bakewell. Can you tell a book by its cover? Apparently not, because I think this book has a remarkably awful cover, yet the first couple of chapters are a delight. By the end I expect to know how to live.
Next up... Motherhood: The Birth of Wisdom ed. by Sheila Lintott. This is from Wiley-Blackwell's Philosophy for Everyone series. The chapter titles really grab me--"How many Experts Does it Take to Raise a Child? Mothering and the Quest for Certainty." Indeed. I've often wondered whether mothers (and fathers) should trust their instincts, and what they should think when the experts say 10 different things. "Pro-Choice Philosopher Has Baby: Reflections on Fetal Life." Hey, me too! Following fetal development up close and personal does make you think. "A Face Only a Mother Could Love? On Maternal Assessments of Infant Beauty" Ha! Everyone else does seem biased. Me on the other hand...I happen to have the world's best looking kids. "Natural Childbirth is for the Birds." Hope the essay says exactly that, because (frankly) that's my view. Full report coming when I'm done.
7 comments:
These all look really fun. Thanks for the links! I might get them all...at some point. Too many dang books in my pile. Especially want to hear about the Montaigne book. One of my college professors once told me my essays were Montainge-esque, but I've never really studied him.
I recently saw a video on Montaigne that was kind of fun .... http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6436583611449448580#
The motherhood book looks intriguing. If you enjoyed that, you might check out Jane Smiley's essay on motherhood and the exercise of power.
Wish I could remember the title . . .!
Guess who doesn't like The Evolution of Bruno Littlemore.
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/secondhandsmoke/2011/02/02/praising-fictional-bestiality-in-the-newspapers/
It's an incredible book, and actually doesn't have the message Wesley Smith thinks it does. (There's no substitute for actually reading the book!) Bruno is a passionate humanist. He loves all things human, and in fact wants to be human. He thinks being human is better. Just what Smith wants to hear! And no, there's no real bestiality. Bruno is human! He just happens to look like an ape.
Did you mean that Auster's Timbutku is a rare instance of animal character that works, or rather one typical of those that don't? I'm interested in animal fiction and have not read it yet. I've just started The Evolution of Bruno Littlemore which seems great!
Timbuktu is a rare instance of animal characters that work (yeah, that wasn't clear). Good book, definitely worth reading. Hope you keep enjoying "Evolution"!
Post a Comment